Thursday, 20 June 2013 Directorate General of Religious Courts Body (Badilag) 



Bahasa Indonesia | العربية
 
 
Main Menu
Home
Profile Badilag
Overview Religious Court
Organization
Legislation
e-Publication
News & Event
EMC Corner
About Us
Site Map
Judicial Transparency
Budget Transparency
Cases Statistics
Judgments Publication
Case Track
Standard Operating Procedures
Case Handling Procedure
Prodeo Procedure


e-book



Your Voice
Do you think Indonesian Religious Courts gain more public trust?
 
 
 
 
 



THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE JUDGE TO THE LEGAL PROFESSION AND BUREAUCRACY (Alfitri, S.Ag, M.Ag, LLM) PDF Print E-mail
Written by Rahmat Arijaya   
Friday, 05 August 2011 15:14

Please click the title to download:

THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE JUDGE TO THE LEGAL PROFESSION AND BUREAUCRACY IN THE COMMON LAW SYSTEMS AND THE CIVIL LAW SYSTEMS

Alfitri*

In terms of the process of becoming a judge, a considerable distinction exists between the common law systems and the civil law systems. It is such a long process to qualify as a judge in the common law that the invitation to the Bench or appointment is ‘rarely granted before the age of 40’.[1] Before this, one must have a successful career in the legal profession: as a barrister or a solicitor, if he/she can become a judge.[2] Hence, being a judge in the common law systems is not a matter of choice per se. Rather, it is also about one’s capability in the legal field. Conversely, judgeship in civil law countries is subject to career preference. Law graduates can apply via Department of Justice recruitment if they prefer to become a judge in their professional careers and serve as a government employee instead of working for a law firm as a lawyer. [3]



* Dosen Jurusan Syariah, STAIN Samarinda. Tulisan ini adalah bagian dari tugas mata kuliah dalam program Master of Laws (LL. M.), di the University of Melbourne, Australia, tahun 2005. Pengutipan terhadap isi tulisan ini hendaknya dilakukan dengan ijin dari penulis karena tulisan ini masih dikembangkan oleh penulis.

[1] Mary Ann Glendon et al, Comparative Legal Tradition; Text, Materials and Cases (2nd ed, 1994) 590.

[2] See, eg, Catriona Cook et al, Laying Down the Law (5th ed, 2002) 27-29.

[3] George E Glos, Comparative Law (1979) 28.

 

 

Last Updated on Friday, 05 August 2011 15:32
 
 
 
 















User Login



Online Visitor
We have 5 guests online
 
Term & Condition Site Map | Our Contact
Copyright © 2006 Ditjen Badilag MA-RI all right reserved.
e-mail : dirjen[at]badilag[dot]net
This website looks excellent on 1024x768 pixel display resolution
with Mozilla Firefox browser and Linux OS